My Psychiatric Label and How I Got It.
By Patricia Lefave, Labeled, D.D. (P)

Segment 7
 2:19:35 PM
 

As I have said, it is we who have played some version of this ‘game’ before who understand It best. The demonstration showing what you understand to be based upon WHERE you see the start of the action equates to Chaos Theory: The Circle of Ten Theorem. What appears at first to be ‘random’ with no discernible pattern or connection can be predicted with one hundred per cent accuracy IF you know the true starting point of the equation. My protagonist's leader, the Creator/Destroyer, the "Trickster," who sits at the top of the pyramid of power AND enlightenment, (for him it is not ‘or’) as it is the only point where both sides are "one", and who understands it all, appears to believe that no matter how It all works out in the endgame, just ‘in the process of life itself’, HE "wins" either way.

Why? Well, here is what I ‘get.’
If mindless aggression and lack of reason prevails, he has made a huge pile of money, has gained a lot of power through the collecting of very personal information, which might be very useful too, and there is no evidence he INTENDED to do anything immoral or illegal. He has total control of the situation and everyone inside It. He has also succeeded in ‘levelling’; telling the truth and/or getting "even." (But not equal) He raises himself up by looking down on all ‘others’. In the end, if It causes the disappearance of everything and everyone, he can tell himself that those who bought into It, or who ‘failed to see what was right in front of them,’ have brought It upon themselves, so they are getting just what they deserve anyway. (Does that sound familiar?) In which case, the aggressor persona, who represents power used without reason, (a change of personality put on as easily as changing one's suit) "wins." At least that is what THIS victim gets out of ‘It.’

If the world wakes up to It, recognizes HOW It happens and WHY, (because they ‘experience It’ for themselves) they will stop promoting and supporting the mindless aggression of those who have expanded their egos to cover the universe, stop blaming the victims for BEING victims, stop admiring the aggressors, and stop ‘validating themselves by invalidating all other points of view.’ In the second case, recreating It will cause the disappearance of mindless hatred by automatons who all blindly follow the leader, applauding anything that anyone says for no other "reason" than the one saying It is a member of their "special" group. Extrapolating further on this, it is his enlightenment side, (his genuine original self, his victim side, who was forced to hide himself for the sake of his own survival), who then "wins."

So, either way, so it would seem, the leader and only the leader, really wins. Unfortunately there is something his dominating side does not see as he also is still steering his course through life with his attention focused on, and his hands tightly gripping, his rear view mirror. The leader has a blind spot of which he appears to be unaware. He is, in fact, bringing about his own end by choosing to identify with the aggressor, and he is doing It on a transcendental timeless level. His cause knows no bounds. If he doesn't soon change his own mind, his ‘recreation’ (meaning ‘reproduction’ and/or ‘entertainment’) will cause his OWN disappearance as his game is catching up to him in time. He is right about something. The ultimate purpose of the mind is to ensure its own survival. That is the only thing that is sure to motivate anyone, especially the most severely and perfectly narcissistic, to give up their domination game, this game for children, and finally grow the hell up. Either he gets It (that he is trapped in his own creation) OR It will get him.

The aggressor does what he does, in my opinion, because he was once a victim himself, who waited for truth or a rescuer/saviour who did not come. So, I think he decided there was no messiah and that he had only the choice between being a victim, or switching positions and becoming like the aggressor, as the only way out of the dilemma. What he does not understand is that his "saviour" does not believe in domination as a solution to anything because he already knows the outcome. His "saviour" will not force him to do anything, nor trick him into co-operation. His "saviour" rescues him by telling him the truth about himself. The gift the rescuer brings is only the truth and the truth WILL set him free from his self delusion and will give him back his Self control. The ‘trick’ to that is to accept the truth he does not like.

 
It is self control (not just self restraint) but Self definition, Self determination, Self actualization, that gives us life as individuals, unique and separate from all others. But there is one more side to this which is not yet seen. The spiritual partner of the rescuer is the converter, a complementary rather than adversarial partner/opposite. Having been contacted by her partner, the converter sees the error on a collective level, from her right brain, and switches the premise back to one of sanity and reason.

Only when the leader understands that his own domination side is the cause of his own victim side, being ‘at effect’, will he recognize that he is ‘the Source of his own pain;’ an identity to which even he admits. As it is, he has created a lose, lose, lose situation. If he does not understand that he must convert his own premise back to equality, not entropy, then his victim side cannot be rescued from his aggressor side. The persona will overpower the original mind which will NOT survive. The "action" the domination side of him likes to "observe" with a sense of detachment, is really the action between his two sides; a sort of Armageddon of his own soul. He is not "outside" his own paradigm. He is the cause AND the effect. So he remains his own victim; trapped within his own paradoxical ‘solution.’ 

If the aggressor does not see his "win" is an illusion, then he also loses. If he manages to beat everyone at his own game, he ends up in the infinite void, having invalidated everyone else, with nothing left to have power over. His "Pi" creates infinite destruction. If all his followers fail to see they are trapped in a no-win situation, and just keep blindly following the leader, then they all lose too and so does everyone who is ‘at effect’ in this chain reaction. If the leader does not soon understand that he MUST give up his con game and expose It completely, then his own survival will be the ultimate cost of refusing to do so. In the end, he will give himself the "prize" for coming in last in his self created race as all he is really doing is running around in a circle; the infinite loop of destruction of his own creation.  He is, in other words, the Alpha and the Omega of his own destruction; the first and the last of dysfunction. It is a circular argument and it is true that "what goes around comes around" and that these kinds of leaders literally don't know whether they are coming or going. They have lost their sense of direction altogether. They have embraced, the ‘unreasonable,’ with boundless enthusiasm, as a ‘solution.’

Those of us who attempt to reveal the truth of this, especially if the leader is said to be "charismatic," become the first targets of such leaders and his loyal zombie-like, unquestioning followers. Such leaders are not threatened by those who don't see, but who "think" that they do see. They are only threatened by those who DO see and who threaten to expose the truth that would dis-empower the leader if the blind followers were to see it too. Since power is what he lives for, he regards preserving It as equivalent to his SURVIVAL. Therefore one of three outcomes is usually the case in such groups when someone questions the leader or his system:

1. The questioner is forced out of the group, and often judged as unsuitable for membership.

2. The questioner, getting nowhere, quits as he or she cannot live with the status quo as expected to do by the rest of the group.

3. The questioner pushes to expose the errors to other group members and gets targeted him/herself and regarded as "sick" or "crazy" or just a troublemaker who doesn't seem know there is no "I" in "team" like everyone else in the group.

I believe my own protagonist has been able to hide in plain sight so successfully because when he uses his ‘secret’ training and It's manipulations, misdirection, disinformation and covert behaviours, he blends right in with his workplace which operates in very much the same way. He and psychiatry are operating from basically the SAME faulty premise, though most psychiatrists just don't get it. That's why this nurse feels "superior" to them too, for they ALSO have bought into this con. As the Psych Prof. states in her analysis: The power of my protagonist's game "sustains us in our imaginations" (or for some in concrete reality) "only so long as we pay daily devotion to the household gods of our family romance." (You know. The all controlling, perfect parents who can never be wrong nor blamed for anything and this is how we know we are all ‘normal.’)

I suggest that you read this article again focused on the concepts (or the meta-message ) but the second time you read it, use the dysfunctional family as the concrete framework matched to the abstract concepts. Rather than a cult leader at the top of the pyramid structure, or a system of ‘enlightenment,’ think of the autocratic father. Then read the same "play" again with a gang leader at the top, then with an abusive husband, then an abusive controlling employer, a high school clique leader, Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Machine, Idi Amin on top, or even the psychiatric profession itself which is supporting its own parallel pyramid structure.

Substitute ANY closed system in which a group of followers is controlled by an "authority" figure at the top, who cannot be questioned and who's system cannot have any fault found within It by those beneath him in the hierarchy. There you will find the infinite power created by the DOMINATION Pi.

Trapped in one's own creation; it is a self Deluded, self defeating judgement Pi.

As the leader may well ask, "Do you think that understanding it is enough?''

No. They must DO something about It. What they do is switch It back by taking It a further 180 degrees to return to the starting point and then move beyond It.

 
What needs to be "switched"?
The premise, or starting point, which works by excusing (or enabling and supporting the aggressor) and blaming the victim. The solution is not to choose to live EITHER within your own mind OR to live out of your mind. It is to transcend these opposites which are being presented as the only choice and live in both internal and external reality at the same time using the ONLY premise that ever really works: equality of Being. Remember? This is about "making your life work." This can only be seen for what It really is from outside the "unreasonable Pi," outside the system itself, and with an overview of the whole thing. Having trouble relating to the "Pi" thing? Ok. Then let's use the self-fulfilling prophecy framework instead.

The aggressor set his goal first. The aggressor's goal is based upon his OWN delusions of grandeur. To maintain that delusional belief, he will invalidate EVERYTHING that suggests he is wrong about anything. He unloads his OWN delusional beliefs using the defense mechanism of subjective projection, i.e. He's not crazy; his victim is crazy for calling HIM crazy.

This sets the tone for his whole routine. He then does and says all the things necessary to create the desired effects. He manipulates the target to report all of the things which are, in fact, happening, to the group which he has already manipulated also to HEAR what is being reported, in the terms in which HE wants It to be heard. The more his target reports the truth, the more the group hears It as the target's "delusions" or lies. Everyone follows his lead, never imagining the aggressor is ‘orchestrating the whole thing’ since, "he would have no reason to do so." This is a nexus statement which is positive or negative, but the truth on some level, depending upon one's "perspective." One's perspective is directly related to the premise accepted as "reality." So It is always true, one way or another.

Stated concretely It is:

1. That's right, he would have no reason to do so, therefore he is without reason since he did do It.

Or

2. That's right, he would have no reason to do so, therefore It did not occur since he seems "reasonable" to the group. Therefore the target must be "unreasonable" for accusing him "falsely."